Thursday 12 January 2012

For Goodness' Sake

and annoying.
I was thinking back to a Philosophy of God course I took a semester or two back, and one of the main criticisms against atheists is that they are a godless (that kinda goes with the territory though) and immoral lot. At the time of that course I was still struggling through my thoughts on religion (against it in most cases) and god (if pushed, I lean towards deism). But even then, I thought this was an incredibly asinine statement, of course atheists can be moral-- in fact there is an argument to be made that they have the potential to be "more" moral than their Christian counterparts, which is not to say that Christians can't be moral.

One of first results when searching "morality"
why? Because monkey in a suit, with a gun that's why
Many of the people in that Philosophy class felt that without God, mankind had no basis for morality. Fortunately, I was not the only one to point out the silliness of the claim. You can derive morals from many paths other than religion; empathy, reciprocity (the golden rule, basically), and sympathy. I laid out the argument like this 1) I like to do good things because they make me feel good 2) I like to do good things because I want other people to do good things to me 3) I like to do good things because it makes others feel good.  Now that may not be the most comprehensive explanation in the world, but I feel that it sufficed for the purposes of that class. 

Put in cynical terms,
be nice so that you don't get blown up?
One question that was never satisfactorily answered in that class was, why morality derived from fear of divine punishment more "moral" than one derived from empathy. If your only reason for being moral is that your God told you to do so (on fear of damnation), then there are two implications. First, you are relying upon a text that has been edited, and translated in any number of possibly erroneous ways, as a guide for your life. Assuming you've read the whole thing, then you run into problems of selectivity. Why do Christians eat shellfish, but claim that premarital sex is wrong? Both are "sins" in the Bible, and yet one is ignored. Furthermore, if you haven't read the Bible (and this is pretty common:  http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Society/2010/0928/In-US-atheists-know-religion-better-than-believers.-Is-that-bad) then you rely upon the Church, or some other worldly authority. Relying upon someone else to tell you how to live your life seems quite at odds with the claim that you believe in the word of God. What if your church/priest/pastor/pope is wrong?
He does have a very big hat though
The second issue is that you are good only because you fear damnation. I realize that this does not hold true for all (or maybe even most) Christians, but the implied message is still there. Don't sin because if you do, then God will send you to Hell. The concept of hell is irreconcilable to me with the concept of a benevolent god. I raised this issue many times as a kid; why would god send people to hell just because they're not Christian? Why would god send anyone to hell for any reason (falling short of truly heinous things such as rape)? Don't get me wrong though, I know many Christians who are paragons of morality. I also know many atheists/deists/whatever else who are just as moral. One point that I maintain though, is that most Christians I know do not in fact adhere to the Bible 100% because they do things like mix cloths  (Deuteronomy 22:1), get haircuts ( Leviticus 19:27 ), and let women speak in church (1 Corinthians 14:34). I bring up that last verse because a lot of people I talk to claim that the Old Testament isn't as important as the new, but as far as I know, Corinthians is in the New Testament. 

this is a pun
My point is, it shouldn't matter what you believe so long as you try and be a decent person. I don't care what you believe so long as you're not an asshole.




Sunday 8 January 2012

The Five Year Rule

Apparently Ted Mosby can be in things other
than How I Met Your Mother

I was thinking about the future, as is the plight of a college senior, when I remembered a movie I watched on my first(?) date with the old ball and chain. One of my favorite quotes from Happythankyoumoreplease, a movie with Ted Mosby as a writer instead of an architect, is that five years from now you'll look back and think what an asshole you were five years ago.
Penn&Teller, pointing out assholery
since the dawn of time
There's a lot of truth to this quote, because I've never thought of myself as asshole in the present but whenever I think back to who I used to be... well, I cringe. It's not that I'm a terrible person from day to day, it's just that as I mature I tend to look back on what I did with my "I'm so smart now" glasses. This got me to thinking though, if I'm only an asshole from the perspective of future (actually, present looking at past) me, then what does that imply about my choices? I like that to think that it means I do the best I can in the present, and just accept that I might think it was stupid when I reach the future.

Apparently this is a misquote,
but I prefer this to the real one
What I take away from this is that every single stupid (or not so stupid) decision we make now is what will define us in the future. Every single mistake we make adds up in immeasurably tiny ways to contribute to the person that you will become, even if you are happy with the person you are now. Now, before all one of my readers tells me that I should quit the pseudo-philosophy-- I know that this post is quite silly, and that it will look even dumber in five years' time. But, and this is a big but, this is the post I need to make at this point in my life-- it's the right choice now, even if I might make fun of it later. Time is a funny thing, for one thing we it is almost impossible to define the present. Most importantly to me though, is the fact that time completely changes my perspective on almost everything. What was intensely painful yesterday might be the transformative moment of my life when viewed from the future.

An overly idealistic
but thought-provoking view on fathers
Largely, I suppose that it's impossible to tell where you will be in five years but now I try to use that point of view as my guide for choices. How will I view this decision five years from now? Well I'll probably think I was an asshole, but at least I can admit that.





Memory

It might be easier to date elephants
you only ever have to compliment them once
because they never forget

So I was browsing reddit trying to come up with a topic to blog about when a great idea struck me right in the face. Unfortunately,  I then tried to open wordpress (www.blainedenton.wordpress.com) which crashed repeatedly. After I finally got it open, I had completely forgotten what it was I was going to write about. I then proceeded to try and re-open all the tabs I'd just closed from reddit which achieved absolutely nothing. I'd been so distracted for those few crucial seconds that I couldn't remember anything about my idea.

If it weren't for this little guy I would resort
to sitting in the corner crying over lost ideas
Thankfully for me (and my vast audience of one) I came up with the bright idea of writing about my piss-poor memory. I could go into the intricacies of how the new social media has destroyed our ability to pay attention to-- oooh a butterfly. But instead I want to write about the importance of remembering the important things.

Pictured: what my wall would have looked like if
 I actually took pictures of it
I am a fan of post-its. I like to write things down and when I'm busy, I like to see what I have to do, do it, then throw the now useless post into the garbage and celebrate my triumph over paper that thinks it can tell me what to do. Were it not for post-its, notebooks, and whiteboards I wouldn't know where to be at what tie, or what to do by what date. But beyond just the scheduling aspect, I use these tools to remind of certain things. 
If ever I find myself an amnesiac in search of a killer
I'd be well-prepared

For the longest time I had the words "memento mori" written on my whiteboard, which means remember that we must die (or some such thing). I had this up there because it always puts things into perspective-- of everything I have to give in this world, the most valuable is time. Now this may be because I'm an English/Education Major which means that I will be paid with a salary of chickens-- but I also think that it is true for most people. The only asset I can never regain is time and as such I am very picky about what I spend my time on. I like to be productive, but I also need some downtime in which to reflect and relax. I need to constantly remember these things because otherwise I find myself falling into a routine wherein I am not valuing  my very limited time here on Earth. And since my actual memory is useless, I like to write things down because then I can see exactly what it is I'm thinking and evaluate if my actions are in-line with those goals*.
Meditation: lets you cause rocks to float above the ocean

*HOLY BALLS! I just remembered what I was going to write about initially; being still does not equal doing nothing (It pains me to admit that this quote is from the new Karate Kid movie. More on that later.

Saturday 7 January 2012

The Ability to Recover

I approve this message
Something I've been thinking about a lot lately is the importance of pushing yourself. I was the stereotypical "smart" kid in high school in that I didn't have to try very hard. Getting good grades was easy, but after a while it became monotonous and I lost interest. I still got decent grades but  I never felt a sense of accomplishment. I coasted through freshman and sophomore year, getting Bs and maybe one or two As. I don't remember when exactly it changed changed, but junior and senior year I started becoming useful again and improved my grades dramatically. I think a lot of it had to do with me discovering weight-training. I was always fairly overweight as a child, but one day I discovered www.t-nation.com and it sparked a passion for iron that has not yet gone out, and probably never will. As I learned to push myself in the gym, I remembered the joys of pushing myself intellectually; I never really enjoyed the busy work that we were frequently assigned but I saw the fun in engaging in class discussions and essays.
I was not however, as bad as this
For whatever reason, I lost this sense of challenge when I began college. I returned to my old coasty ways, and did as little as possible to maintain average grades. But, as history likes to repeat itself I got my act together junior and senior year. The most notable example of this is that between summer and this past semester I've probably done more work than the rest of my college career combined. Over summer I was working 40+ hours a week and taking 15 credits, in the fall I was working two jobs taking 5 English classes, and part of two clubs. Now, I bring all this up not to show off (which is hard considering no one is following the blog yet) but mostly to elucidate my point. In the gym, there's a certain amount of effort you need to invest before you begin to see results. You can be in there faffing about on the ab machine and texting the entire time and you'll never make progress. But if you get in there and bust your ass then you begin to become better, and I've found that the same is true for the intellectual side of things. I wasn't making progress because I wasn't challenging myself, but when I finally decided to throw myself into my academic life I flourished. My workload kept getting heavier and heavier, but I kept getting stronger and stronger. In short, if you have nothing to recover from, you'll never make progress.
Male or female, this is the equivalent
of sleeping on a book hoping to absorb its powers



Thursday 5 January 2012

To Buy or Not To Buy

Damn you and your seductive marketing
So I've been doing some major thinkery in the last couple of days, centered mostly on whether or not I need a new phone. I want a new phone that's for sure, my phone is old the touch screen isn't as sensitive as it used to be. I also currently do not have a data plan, and when I move off campus I won't have constant access to wifi. If I get an iPhone I'll be able to text my girlfriend (whom I'm fairly fond of) for free. Plus I'll be able to talk to Siri and feel like I am one of the cool kids. However, I really don't like Apple's marketing, AT&T or Verizon very much. I think that cellphone plans are insanely overpriced, and that it is ridiculous to force customers to choose a voice plan (I have an exceedingly strong aversion to talking on the phone).

Even Obama doesn't enjoy it, and he's on an airplane
I've been looking at iPhones online and thus far I've put one in my online cart at least 37 times, only give up and close the window. I can't bring myself to do it, it costs so much moneys and as a future teacher I'm reluctant to part with what little I have. It's not just the $200 to buy the phone, but it's the $80 a month that I have to promise to pay. Now, I'm fairly stupid when it comes to buy as I have a tendency to buy things I have no need for, and then wallow in guilt over wasting money. I am however graduating in a few months which means that the real world will be asking me for my money. I would also like to visit the old ball and chain (girlfriend) in Florence this semester, and spending money on a phone would make that more difficult.

Pictured: girlfriend after reading
the ball and chain remark
Is this just me whining about wanting shiny new toys? Partly, but I also feel that it is the embodiment of something much worse. I'm growing up. If I had been debating this last year, I would have just bought the phone. I would have paid for the ticket to Florence, and I would have thrown money at my problems hoping that they would go away. But now... now the stark reality of real life is staring me in the face. Sure, I'm not poor by any stretch of the imagination... but I don't have a job lined up yet, nor do I have anywhere to live rent-free in the US (my parents made the silly decision of living in another country).  My point is, I think that this is some sort of horrible milestone in my life where I choose between shiny things and practicality. I have a phone and an iPod so what use do I have for an iPhone? I currently pay $10/month for unlimited texting pay for calls as I use them, so why pay 8 times that for a fixed number of texts and calls that I will never use?
Kaylee from Firefly likes shiny things, so they must be good
As much as I want a new toy, I know that it will not make me happier in the least-- in fact I'll definitely regret it when it comes time to pay for rent and the like. Why then am I still so tempted to buy a new phone? I blame the marketists, and my own inability to accept something that I know intellectually. I'd like to think that after all this, I will not go ahead and buy the phone. In fact, I probably won't... but I've said that about a lot of things. Hopefully this marks the beginning of me growing up, of me not wasting money on things I have no need for, and of me being able to control my impulses.
Look at it sitting there,
tempting me with its shiny ways



Wednesday 4 January 2012

Please Don't Pee on the Walls

Translation: (left) you can't pee here
(right) but here is fine
So another post about home, which is fitting since there's only a week left in Christmas break till I return to other home (school). Something that has been nagging at me since I've been back is the propensity for people to A)  Enforce the most asinine of rules B) tautological (repetitively true) rules C) be aggressively polite.
This sign is a warning about this sign


The first point about enforcing asinine rules is probably the most annoying thing I've ever experienced and I can think of two examples that really stand out. Back in high school we were hosting a rugby practice for the under 19s national team which meant that players from other schools would be coming, and perhaps even players who were no longer students at all. I watched as one such person stood arguing with one of our security guards (private school with a lot of moneys). I approached because the rugby player (whose nickname I would later learn was Pumbaa, no Timone though) as he didn't seem to be able to communicate in Tagalog. After talking to the guard, I found out that he didn't want to let Pumbaa through because of male earrings went against the student dress code. I explained that Pumbaa was not in fact a student, but simply a visitor, this of course did not achieve anything. I eventually told Pumbaa to just remove the earrings. In my defense, as soon as we got past the guard I did tell him he should put them back on out of spite. Yup, we showed him.

The second example of such silliness occurred this break as I went to the Department of Foreign Affairs (not the one where you sleep with foreigners) to renew my passport. I'd scheduled an appointment and arrived the recommended hour and a half ahead of time. However, upon arriving at the gate I had a second encounter with security guards. He held up his hand and told me that I was not allowed to wear shorts inside the building-- rather than ask if he'd prefer that I take them off, I asked if he was serious. More importantly, I asked him why such a rule existed. His response was, "it's our policy".  I then stood there angrily for quite some time and realized 1)that trying to hit a man with a gun would be ill-advised 2)it wouldn't help me get in 3) he was just doing his job. Once more, I was forced to sell out as I went to the closest mall and bought a pair of pants (the pants of my oppression if you will).

Superman wears underwear on the outside
but no one gives him crap (note to self: develop laser-eyes)

The silliness of these encounters leads me to what actually prompted this particular instance of bloggery. Driving around the city of Manila and its surrounding areas, you are bound to come across signs that say "please don't pee on the wall," or a variation thereof. It has always struck me as incredibly disheartening that such signs are necessary, shouldn't it be the default state of existence to not pee on someone else's property? Now, whenever I rant about this to my friends they say (in a voice you use to talk to idiots, or puppies) "Blaine, they're poor. They don't know better." or "They have no where else to pee." To this I say bah humbug. Being poor in no way means that you are stupid, nor does it preclude from using public restrooms. I don't know how it's come about but a lot of people pee on walls, and a lot of people just accept it. Granted I don't know how you would prevent this short of electrifying your walls (which while awesome, probably wouldn't work). My point here is not to solve the pee-crisis that has stricken my beloved nation, but instead to ask a question. Why do we choose to harangue people over silly things like earrings and shorts, while simultaneously ignoring people peeing all over the place. As much as it annoys me, I believe that it is simply a way for us to exert control in a world where we increasingly have none. There's no way to hunt down (and pee on as a golden rule type of thing) those who pee on walls, but if you see someone violating the dress code you can quite easily deny that person access to your facilities. I understand that this is a complex country full of complex issues, and just like any other country there are always cultural tensions.


Are Filipinos the Canadians of Asia?
We don't have Maple Syrup so I'm not sure
As I mentioned, many Filipinos ( the ones that I know) have a tendency to be aggressively polite, a tendency which might create problems when we have to enforce ridiculous rules. As much as it annoyed me to be told that I needed pants, I'm sure the guard enjoyed it even less since it required confrontation. At this point, I do have to wonder why we couldn't just let it go-- except of course for the fact that he didn't want to lose his job. The perfect example of this kind of pushy politeness is food. Whenever you go to a Filipino household, expect to be offered food. Even if you are not at all hungry, I advise that you accept because if you don't you will be constantly harangued with offers until finally, you are crushed by the wave of hospitality. I believe that this tension between pettiness and manners is what stems a lot of what I consider incongruous behavior in the country. Politeness is a virtue, but God forbid someone try to pass you on the road because then you'll have to speed up (no matter how slow you were going) and then maybe honk and flash your headlights. The high premium put on maintaining politeness and manners probably leads to a lot of forced smiles and gritter teeth. Tension which we have to release through what silly avenues are made available to us.
I fully support peeing on this "sculpture" by Duchamp,
but he'd probably approve

Tuesday 3 January 2012

Foreign Devils

What I imagine I look like in Asia before people
realize that I'm half-Asian

Growing up in the Philippines as a Filipino-American has definitely impacted the way I view the world. For one, I have developed a zen-like patience through simply dealing with traffic and the general lack of polite driver-y throughout the country. However, beyond my stereotyping of Asian drivers (of which I am one, so it’s okay), I believe that growing up in a country as uniquely placed as the Philippines has taught me something about the concept of “foreign-ness”. I am a man of many words, and one word which quite effectively encapsulates the topic of this post is “gweilo,” which is a derogatory Chinese word for foreigners. I’ve been led to believe that it sometimes translates as “foreign devil”.
The concept of a foreign devil is intriguing to me as I am quite frequently mistaken for one in my own country. Although I am half-Filipino, in the province I am frequently greeted with yells of “hey-Joe” (a throwback to the term Joe referring to American soldiers and thus, white people). Sure, there’s no malice behind this greeting, and some might even argue it is an attempt at friendliness but I disagree. It is simply another way for someone to let you know that you’re not “one of us”. I remember when as I child a tricycle driver (see picture for reference) once told my father to “go back to the States” and “get out of [the driver’s] country”. Even as an eight year old, I found this quite amusing. You see, my father was in his sixties (or late fifties, I’m not quite sure how old he is), the tricycle driver was probably twenty or so. All in all, I think this meant that my dad had probably been in the Philippines for longer than that man had been alive. The man then ill-advisedly kicked the side of our car, which then led to my father also ill-advisedly trying to start a fight with the man. I don’t remember the exact details, but given my father’s age I’m going to assume they engaged in a round of gentlemanly fisticuffs.

It took my father a while to get on the tights
and gloves, but I'm sure it was worth the effort


Not all my childhood was spent being mortified by my father’s actions however. From sixth grade onwards, I attended an international school with what is probably considered a very “diverse ethnic” population. I use the sarcastic quotes because I truly and utterly despise the use of the word “ethnic” (note sarcastic quotes once more). As I understand it, ethnicity simply refers to being part of a social group with common cultural traditions. Why is it then that “ethnic food” only ever refers to Indian, Mexican, or Chinese food? Do white people not have ethnicity? I understand that the vast majority of people do not have any intentions towards condescension and that the word is simply that, a word. But as a self-proclaimed man of words, I can’t help but wince (quietly and so that no one notices, because I don’t like preaching at people).  Much like labeling some people as foreign devils, I believe the term ethnic is incredibly divisive.  If we, as the current majority of white Americans, label others as ethnic then we tacitly imply that to be white is the default state of existence.  I consider myself quite lucky that I am both American and Filipino I get to see things from the perspective of both the dominant culture in America, and as a minority.  There is also the added benefit of being able to flee either country should things take a turn for the worse. Here’s hoping that the Philippines never goes to war with the US.

it's true because the paper says so

The point of this story is that the belief in “gweilos” and “ethnics” can end up becoming a self-fulfilling prophecy. If you tell people that they’re different then they’ll probably act different, and you’ll probably treat them as such. More importantly however is the fact that these words annoy me. If you think that that is a silly reason, then consider this: your complaint does not reference pachyderms, therefore it is irrelephant.
the blog is called pundemonium, don't act
so surprised that I make awful puns


Schroedinger's Paper








Schrödinger’s Paper
Right now I bet you just noticed that you were breathing consciously, or maybe you just noticed how often you blink, if you’re really stubborn then maybe you’ll begin to feel your left hand itch. I know it’s cliché, but I believe that “when you stare into the abyss, the abyss stares back at you.”  From psychology, to physics, and your day-to-day life, the echoes of Nietzsche’s idea are still reverberating through the intellectual world. As I sit in front of my computer trying to figure out what to write on, I consider how the act of thinking about my writing is impacting what I write. One of my biggest fears when thinking about writing is that somehow it will all stop working. I’ve never quite understood my own creative process, between ages 11 and 21, I generated about twenty pages of non-academic writing; they were all crap. Between midsummer of this year and right now, I’ve written a couple of hundred pages of either fiction or nonfiction. I like to believe that at least some of those pages are decent. I don’t know what sparked this deluge of creativity, as I’d always had an interest in writing. I just never had anything to say, or at least I didn’t know how to say it. So I try not to think too hard about where this newfound creativity came from, because I’m worried it’ll go away. Although I realize that he made this thought-experiment with his tongue firmly in cheek, I think that Schrödinger was really onto something with that cat of his.

In short, if you put a cat in a box (with or without a fox) and place a tiny radioactive particle in said box, there is an equal chance that in an hour that particle will have decayed or remained the same. If that particle decays, it will trigger a hammer that will release poison into the box, thus killing the cat. However, we can’t know whether the cat is alive or dead unless we open the box, thus it is said that the cat is both alive and dead until we observe it. What I take from this is that, 1) Schrödinger  did not like cats, and 2) I do not understand quantum physics. However, as an English major I do not need to actually know things, I can simply interpret them with artistic license (no offense to English majors, this is simply artistic license) . This cat, if it remains unobserved is un-dead. But not in the zombie way, we just simply don’t know what state it’s in, so it is functionally neither, and both. So in this case, if you stare into the abyss, you kill the cat.
In psychological circles, which I am clearly qualified to talk about because I once took psych-101, there is said to be an observer-expectancy effect. What this usually means is that it is very easy for an experiment’s bias to cause him or her to unconsciously influence the participants. However, this is not limited to people in lab-coats as a common corollary to this is confirmation bias. For example, I am an avid gamer and I periodically decide to base my game choices on reviews. Now, I don’t always agree with these reviews because sometimes I’ll pick up a game and truly despise every aspect of it. Then I’ll saunter over to my laptop, prepared for the vindication of my hatred. Unfortunately, there seem to be a number of misguided people on the interwebs that disagree with me. As such, I am fairly unlikely to take their views seriously, an even less likely to continue to frequent their websites. But the guy who trashed Transformers: War for Cybertron? He knows what’s up. What does this have to do with Schrödinger, cats, and the abyss you ask? Well, let me address the question I just told you to ask. I think that the world we observe may not be as objective as we like to think because what looks blue to me, could very well be green to someone else (this is frequently the case as I have a terrible time distinguishing colors). As far as I can tell, everything in the world is subjective; everything is subject to your unique collection of experiences and beliefs, even this sentence.

Remember when I told you that you could feel your butt in the chair? I hope not because I never said that, I said you could feel your tongue in your mouth. Actually I never said that either, but sometimes if you act confident enough you can convince people of anything, regardless of actual fact. Nonetheless, actual facts do sometimes factor into our lives. Some of you have heard of the by-stander effect which states that in a crowded environment, people are unlikely to come to the aid of those in distress. Psychologists believe that this is because we as a group decide that someone else would have already helped the person in need if it were a true emergency. That guy passed out on the train? He’s probably drunk, or else someone would have called 911. Don’t worry though, there is hope for us yet. If you are aware of this effect then you are much more likely to actually call 911, or to intervene when needed. I like to believe that this is because you want to spite whoever it is that told you about the bystander effect by proving him or her wrong and intervening. You know what they say… knowing is half the battle.


But sometimes you don’t, and can’t know how things work. I love to make puns, but if someone yells “make a pun, or I’ll kick this puppy,” I’m usually at a loss. Largely because I’m always surprised that people keep puppies on hand for kicking. I am also fluent in Tagalog, but if some asshole says “quick, say something in Tagalog,” I’ll stammer awkwardly and say… nothing. Which brings me back to my original quandary, please don’t ask me about comma usage. I was editing a paper for my girlfriend, and, she used, commas so often, that I forgot how to, use them, properly; it got to the point that I sounded like Christopher Walken in my head.


The more I think about these things, the more I’m thankful for the fact that even if I don’t know why, something in me has changed. I don’t know if I’ll always have inspiration to write; every week that we have a creative piece due, I go through a brief moment of panic because I have no idea what to write about. It scares me that I’ve never sat down and thought, “Hey this is a great story; I know exactly how to proceed!” Normally I’ll just sit down and start writing, hoping that something good will come. Even now, I try not to examine the process too closely because I’m worried my curiosity will kill the cat (ba-dump-tss).